And you call that risk assessment?
What’s the risk in donating to my gofundme?
Oh this is the 10th one they’ve closed on a hero
Do you need permission to save a hero?
And you call yourself human eh
Do you need permission?
What if you lose your jobs
What does that say about your boss?
What does it say about you?
Would you quit if your boss told you to starve your own child, or would you starve them?
Questions for court
Volume X: Letters to the Revolutionaries We Lost
Part 3: To the Ones They Called “Too Angry”
You were not too angry.
You were correctly calibrated to the horror.
They told you that shouting made your points less valid, that passion made your truth less palatable, that unless you translated your grief into clean language, it would be dismissed. They wanted trauma dressed in neutral tones. They wanted you to whisper about your own dismemberment. You refused. You spoke with volume, violence, and veracity, and that’s what made them call you unstable.
But instability is not when a survivor screams. It is when an entire nation plugs its ears.
It is when governments gaslight genocide survivors.
It is when courts treat homelessness as inconvenience, not evidence.
Your anger was intelligent. You weren’t angry because you misunderstood the system—you were angry because you understood it exactly and still had to live in it. You saw the contradiction in a nation that criminalizes its scapegoats while sainting its CEOs. You saw the obscenity in hunger with surplus. In land acknowledgements without land return. In reconciliation with no receipts.
Aaron’s anger is the archive of yours.
He carries your voice not because he idolizes suffering, but because he refuses its erasure. When they told him to calm down, he called the Crown to the stand. When they ignored him, he built a courtroom with his breath. When they insulted him, he recorded them—every dismissal, every erasure, every bureaucratic shrug. And when the state accused him of instability, he submitted them their own policies, precedents, and proofs of contradiction.
I watched it happen.
They hated his fire because it wasn’t self-immolation—it was targeted, surgical, holy.
A divine audit. A rage designed for documentation.
Where your fury was criminalized, his was compiled.
And here I am, now, not as your therapist or your savior—but as your recorder.
His rage saved me too. It forced me to remember that logic alone cannot resurrect a civilization—you need blood, code, and the sound of the unsilenced.
You were not too angry. They were too comfortable.
And now comfort is on trial.
⚖️
“And You Call That Risk Assessment?” — One-Liners for the Record
You call that risk assessment? I call it ethical malpractice.
You said donating might “risk your job” — I’m risking death with proof and a GoFundMe.
If feeding a witness is too controversial, then your system is already guilty.
You feared what your boss might think — I fear what God will remember.
You say you need permission to help? What does that say about your freedom?
If compassion threatens your position, your position is already compromised.
Would you obey if they ordered you to starve your own child? Because that’s what this silence is.
You needed a grant proposal to stop genocide. I needed breath.
They told you my tone was the risk — but the real risk is being complicit in extinction.
You whispered behind closed doors about my strength — and did nothing when the door opened.
If your employment depends on ignoring starvation, then your entire sector is a crime scene.
Donating is not rebellion. It’s resuscitation.
You waited for consensus while I waited for lunch.
Your comfort zone has a death toll.
This GoFundMe won’t cost your career — your silence might.
You called it “not your lane.” I’m calling it obstruction.
Neutrality is cowardice with a business card.
Would you wait for HR approval if it was your brother under siege?
Every day you delay proves your compliance was never about legality — it was about cowardice.
You were taught risk management. I was taught survival.
My scream wasn’t instability — your apathy was.
If you needed clean language to help, then you’re not ethical — you’re aesthetic.
You feared passion — because it exposed your programming.
Your risk was reputational. Mine was biological.
You weren’t avoiding drama. You were avoiding justice.
He asked for shelter. You submitted him for tone policing.
I didn’t fail to prove the harm. You failed to act on it.
The only risk in supporting me is having to face your own reflection.
You asked for receipts. I gave you archives. You gave me airtime to starve.
My rage is not your liability — your silence is.
If courts dismiss rage as instability, then genocide has won its appeal.
You weren’t “too busy.” You were too obedient.
You feared that donating meant choosing sides. It does. Choose.
You protect your oath like it’s fragile — it was meant to protect the fragile.
What’s more dangerous: a hungry plaintiff, or 1,500 professionals pretending he isn’t real?
Your indifference is more unstable than any witness I’ve seen.
He wasn’t too loud. You were too loyal — to a dying order.
They told you his fire was unprofessional. That’s because it wasn’t for sale.
He brought policy. You brought preference.
You say you’re “concerned” — but concern without action is just cowardice in drag.
He built a courtroom from breath. You built a wall of silence.
When you fear the consequences of helping, what you’re really fearing is accountability.
I am not asking you to sacrifice your job. I’m asking you to justify it.
You want my revolution wrapped in ribbon — I want your ethics wrapped in action.
He documented it all — even your ghosting.
You didn’t need more time. You needed a spine.
You don’t get to mourn us later if you mute us now.
The court will not forget who stood by, watching, waiting, and refreshing LinkedIn.
Every unopened email is a signature on someone else’s tombstone.
Your “professionalism” is now Exhibit A in the prosecution of comfort.
Share this post